Introduction: The organizations providing health services have a significant role in the society. Organizations the utilization of the electronic process can improve the quality and capacity of services and so the level of in the health society. This study identifies and prioritizes the key factors to implement the electronic logistics in the Isfahan Health City.Methods: by reviewing the literature, 28 potential factors for implementation of E-logistics were extracted. After that, the degree of significant of these factors was determined according to the expert using group decision making. to screen the in significant factors a method based on K-means clustering was used. Then using a recent method for ranking the fuzzy numbers, which is based on the interval of the fuzzy numbers and the center of gravity, the space the factors were prioritize according to the overall cost effectiveness index.Results: by K-Means clustering method 8 factors have been screened and the 20 remaining factors were prioritize according to the overall cost effectiveness index. After calculating the distance of each factor with maximum and minimum range of factors, the vision factor with score 3/761 and the Maintenance factor with score 0.093 were identified as the most important and the least important factors respectively.Conclusion: In this study it was found that vision, create project teams, strategy and management support are the most importance factors for the implementation of E-logistics.

Background and Purpose: Manufacturing companies are among those that outsource most of their services to other companies and, in doing so, seek to create value in logistics. The aim of this research is to investigate the creation of logistics value, and for this purpose, the antecedents of logistics performance were examined. Meanwhile, the roles of outsourcing communication quality, satisfaction with communications, and strategic alignment in manufacturing companies in the industrial towns of Mashhad were evaluated.Method: The present research was descriptive-survey in nature. The statistical population consisted of manufacturing companies in the industrial towns of Mashhad. Simple random sampling was used, selecting 50 manufacturing companies in the industrial towns of Mashhad. Four questionnaires were distributed among each company’s CEO, internal manager, public relations manager, and logistics manager, resulting in a total of 200 completed questionnaires.Findings: Results showed that trust has a positive and significant effect on both satisfaction and commitment. Three variables—strategic alignment, commitment, and satisfaction with the relationship—had a positive and significant effect on the quality of logistics outsourcing relationships. Two variables, strategic alignment and satisfaction with the relationship, positively and significantly affected logistics performance. The moderating role of logistics outsourcing relationship quality on the effect of satisfaction with the relationship on logistics performance was not confirmed.Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that strengthening mutual trust and strategic alignment between manufacturing companies and logistics service providers can effectively improve logistics performance. This improvement can lead to reduced supply chain costs, increased speed and accuracy in delivery, and ultimately enhanced customer satisfaction. Therefore, managers of manufacturing companies should carefully select logistics partners and invest in developing long-term, aligned relationships to facilitate greater value creation in the outsourcing process.

Aim & Background: Considering the developments in the battlefields during the last four decades and the effect of meeting method of the warriors need on the battle’ s destiny at the tactical, operational and strategic levels on the one hand and emphasizing different battle methods including homogeneous, heterogeneous, equal, unequal, regular and irregular, classical and non-classical on the success of the battle, nimble and agile logistics on the other hand; The purpose of this paper is an exploratory study of resources in order to enumerate the principles affecting logistics agility which accelerates fulfillment of targets and decrease the battle casualties. Methodology: This research is mixed exploratory with two qualitative (interview) and qualitative (questionnaire) approaches in terms of method and applied in terms of purpose. By reviewing and criticizing the sources and relying on the views of experts, model of principles affecting logistics agility with 13 factors has been developed; and was judged by 92 experts and scholars overlooking the subject. Findings and conclusion: For this writing 3 result levels is derived; firstly in this writing and other related writings, suggested logistics efficiency and agility affected by its following of logistics. Secondly in data qualitative level regarding that the average of thirteen principles on logistics agility is higher than the average of 3; principles have high impact on logistics. Based on numbers The highest average is related to readiness with a rank of 9. 13 and the lowest average is related to national resources with a rank of 5. 20. Also, considering that in T-test, the mean of the indices is 3. 93 and the significance level (sig=0. 000) is less than the research’ s alpha (a=0. 05) the research’ s hypothesis is confirmed; and thirdly by constitution of indices the five capacities in the battlefield is achieved which it is indicated in the conclusion.

Background and Aim: Today, resilience is one of the most important strategies of any organization, especially police organizations, to prevent disruption or return to the original state and more desirable in case of disruption. The purpose of this study is to provide a model for resilient police logistics. Methodology: This research is applied-developmental in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of type. Semi-structured interviews with 22 experts were conducted using purposeful judgment. The community of research participants is the managers and commanders of the Preventive Police and the Greater Tehran Disciplinary Command related to the operational command in the field of preventive police, university professors of logistics of the Preventive Police and the deputy and expert managers of the Greater Tehran Disciplinary Command. They have a minimum bachelor's degree and at least 15 years of management at the highest levels of law enforcement and readiness and support. The method of data analysis is thematic analysis with Atrid-Sterling approach. Findings: The findings of the study include the dimensions, components and resilient logistics indicators of the police preventive police force with emphasis on the Greater Tehran Police Command. The model presented in this study includes a total of 73 indicators in the form of 15 components and 5 main dimensions. Results: Considering that the issue of logistics resilience in the preventive police is a systematic strategy, the results of the research also the dimensions of the resilient police logistics model in the form of a set of organizational, managerial and technical elements in resilience including organization and management, technology, interaction and Approves and emphasizes capabilities.

Researches have indicated that different types of accidents such as events, natural disasters and incidents resulting from human factors are always existed in human life. Normal and abnormal occurrence of unexpected accidents, political issues and similar items may lead to a crisis in community. Therefore, Crisis Management is discussed as one of the most important scientific-practical issues which nowadays different countries, especially developed and developing ones has been disposed to it. In many developed and developing countries, there are centers for establishment of Crisis Management activities called CMC which all stages and processes of CM take place there. Success and sustainability of these centers depends on creating and changing attitude of authorities of CM so that this issue shouldn’t merely place in short term and operational plans but it must be considered with a wider rang.The main elements of a successful crisis management can be trained & efficient manpower, accurate and reliable information system and equipment and efficient logistics system to implement an extensive and coherent operation.Due to these issues, it is important to determine overall system for logistics management during crisis. This article not only present definition for crisis, CM and logistics but also evaluate the role and significance of Logistics in CM. Than after presenting various aspects, basic strategies have been provided for creating a logistics system in crisis.

The maritime transport industry, often referred to as the backbone of global trade, plays a pivotal role in facilitating the movement of goods across international markets. Despite its importance, the industry is plagued by several persistent challenges that hinder its operational efficiency and sustainability. Among the most critical are the imbalance of empty containers, environmental degradation due to emissions and fuel consumption, and inefficiencies in port operations. These issues collectively pose serious implications for cost management, environmental impact, and service reliability. In an effort to address these concerns, this paper proposes a novel multi-objective mathematical model that seeks to optimize three primary goals in an integrated manner: maximizing economic profitability, minimizing the imbalance of empty containers, and enhancing environmental sustainability. The model is designed to reflect real-world shipping dynamics, incorporating the interactions between liner and feeder ships, multiple sea routes, and various types of ports, including hub, feeder, and satellite ports. To demonstrate the practical applicability and robustness of the model, a case study is conducted on a representative shipping network involving selected ports in the Middle East and East Asia. The model is implemented using the General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS), and its outputs are analyzed across three distinct time periods. Results indicate a significant reduction in the number of empty containers, along with concurrent improvements in both cost-effectiveness and environmental performance indicators. Additionally, a comprehensive sensitivity analysis underscores the pivotal role of ship capacity in influencing system outcomes. However, it also reveals that improvements in a single dimension are insufficient for holistic system optimization. Effective and sustainable management of maritime transport requires a multidimensional strategy that balances economic, environmental, and operational factors. The proposed model offers valuable insights for decision-makers aiming to improve the resilience and sustainability of global shipping networks.